Withdraw X from bank with 1 click by Neox

I like the idea but the bank interface is getting a bit crowded with all the quick gears already.

Rune Crafting by Neox

I think there few magic players, cause nobody can auto spell, except on Slayer Monsters. If there is some chance of think about change it, i liked that it be consider. The runes more used are Fire and Air... Need  more mages to use more runes, and later all can think in "How make your own Runes"

Well there are a lot of mage users as to pk you need to use magic to ensure maximum damage. Air, Fire, and Death runes specifically can be very expensive over time.

21 April - Fixes and Additions by Neox

Beautiful

Ban/Remove the support for programs that emulate Android OS system. by Neox

Mod Terror caught me using automatic clicker.. So they have some type of detection

Well clicking the same pixel / pixel region over and over again is easy to detect.

Can we get some event hype and teasers? by Neox

Gimme.

100 day inactivity rule is destroying game by Neox

A possible better solution to this is to lock accounts who are inactive. From there, using the listserv, one email should be sent per forum account (might be a nightmare for people with many forum accounts) that will explain the situation and also explain that your account is locked until you click a verification link and change your password. If the user ignores or does not get this email for whatever reason but decides to play in the future, the client can say that "This account is locked for security reasons. Please check your email for a verification email." This is probably a better message than the current ban message that locked accounts get. This is a solution that does not require moderator intervention and would not be difficult to impliment. For people without verified emails, they should probably continue using the jail system.

To answer your second point though, inactive accounts are definitely at risk to be hacked. You do not know who has party hats or other rare/discontinued items. In addition, inactive accounts will not complain that they were hacked unless that player comes back in the future.

But yes the current jail system is pretty annoying. I understand it is necessary but it feels like it is a rushed solution that should be revisited and improved. I am sure that many mods are tired of dealing with jailed people all day too.

Faster Interaction, Colored Dyes, talking etc by Neox

Yes please. Especially the tree gnome.

Ban/Remove the support for programs that emulate Android OS system. by Neox

I don't know anyone doing this, but why would you consider this is bannable or something? Android users have a huge advantage when it comes to staking over PC players, it's basically stake botting what they do, can switch modes and items at the same time, same whilst they're DM'ing, they can lock the cast screen or w.e and inventory screen and can pretty much eat and cast without missing which is a huge advantage, if someone were able to do it on PC it'd only be fair in my opinion.

Allowing this on PC would make multiers nearly unstoppable. I do agree that android users have a casting advantage. However, that casting advantage is to make up for the disadvantages of playing on Android (harder right clicking, smaller screen makes accurate clicks/taps difficult, very hard to multi effectively).

How would it make any difference to multi if you can only cast one on client? It just makes it 2 actions to cast instead of 3, yes there's less distance for the mouse to move to cast but that doesn't make multilogging easy, multi is actually quite difficult

That's exactly my point. Having one less action required on one client will allow you to use the time saved to manage your other characters a lot better. A lot can be done in the split second saved from not having to click your spell book. Multiply all those split seconds by the number of casts done in a single fight and you will have a lot of time saved that would be used to manage your other clients. It doesn't make multi easy but it makes multi easier.

Ban/Remove the support for programs that emulate Android OS system. by Neox

I agree. I do not doubt that this is happening as the unfair advantage from casting easier might be too good to pass up for PC users.

Anyways it is possible to fingerprint users by using Android's API. The following methods under the BUILD class can be used to identify a users phone type, manufacturer, Android version, etc. ( https://developer.android.com/reference … d/os/Build )

I am sure the information returned by these methods can be spoofed by the simulation software used. However, this is probably a step in the right direction.

Here is a very hacky/hardcoded solution found on stack overflow to detect Google emulator users:

public static boolean isEmulator() {
    return Build.FINGERPRINT.startsWith("generic")
            || Build.FINGERPRINT.startsWith("unknown")
            || Build.MODEL.contains("google_sdk")
            || Build.MODEL.contains("Emulator")
            || Build.MODEL.contains("Android SDK built for x86")
            || Build.MANUFACTURER.contains("Genymotion")
            || (Build.BRAND.startsWith("generic") && Build.DEVICE.startsWith("generic"))
            || "google_sdk".equals(Build.PRODUCT);
}

Using this function might not be the right way to go. Instead the proper solution is probably to store what the methods return into the snapshot database of each user. Later on, if cheating is suspected, mods can investigate these snapshots.

I found humans alt

Why do you never have anything productive to say?